The aesthetics of a camera should be a long way down any intending buyer's checklist. Unfortunately, for someone like myself to agree to such a statement would be a little contradictory. After all, I did set a "colour requirement" during my camera hunt a couple of weeks ago.
That said many have implied that the Canon Digital IXUS 870 IS appeals to them as a "pretty piece of technology", especially since the gold finished version "looks almost like a piece of jewellery".
I for one prefer a touch of "pink-ness" when it comes to my electronic devices even though deep down I know that the colour pretty much does nothing at all.
So if I were to rate this camera based on my colour preference, the IXUS 870 IS will probably fall short of the mark.
Putting bias-ness aside and forgoing the fact that it comes only in silver and gold, in terms of image quality this camera definitely sets a pretty high standard.
But before I begin my testing, I think I should have dinner first. Although the camera doesn't require much strength to hold up but the extra energy may come in handy in time to come, and who knows, the meal itself may come in handy for my "testing" as well.
... An hour later.
Here, let me share with you what I had for dinner.
Looks good doesn't it?
For an inexperienced photographer like myself, basically what you see is what you get – no angles, no lighting, just point and shoot. So basically, if this looks good, it probably is.
To really see-see how good the image quality is, I guess the easiest way to go about it would be a simple comparison as show below.
The left was taken using my boyfriend's (the Teddybear) IXUS 70 (aka PowerShot SD 1000) and the right was using the IXUS 870 IS - same brand, same lighting, same dish, same settings, same photographer, but apparently, different results.
The images are taken using digital macro. The image on the left reflects a duller overall, whereas the one on the right shows more vibrant colours. From the comparison, you can also see that there are fewer traces of film grains (sharper) on the right image as compared to the left.
Now to go into a "higher-level" of "geek-talk".
The Canon Digital IXUS 870 IS (aka the PowerShot SD880 IS Digital ELPH in North America) measures at 9.4cm x 2.4cm x 5.7cm and weighs in at 155g. It is a new Digital IXUS compact camera re-energised by Canon to replace the Digital IXUS 860 IS.
This 10-megapixel digital camera features a 4x zoom lens that covers an angle-of-view range equivalent to that of a 28-112mm lens on a 35mm camera. It is also packed with Canon's optical image stabiliser technology (hence the IS abbreviation in the product name), and a high-resolution 3-inch PureColour II LCD.
In this "version", the camera uses Canon's new DIGIC 4 processor and it boasts some cutting-edge features like Face Detection, i-Contrast, a new FaceSelf-timer function, Servo AF, H.264 compression for movies, and it comes finished in gold or silver.
- 10-megapixel resolution
- 28mm wide-angle 4x optical zoom lens
- Optical Image Stabiliser
- 3-inch LCD PureColor II with wide viewing angle
- 30fps VGA movies
- DIGIC 4 for outstanding images and fast response times
- Great people shots with Face Detection AF/AE/FE/WB, FaceSelf-Timer and Face Select & Track
- Targets blur with High ISO Auto, optical Image Stabiliser, Motion Detection and Servo AF
- Auto Red-Eye Correction in shooting and playback
The speed of the IXUS 870 IS is rather impressive. It started up in roughly a second or so and you can shoot right after. The shot-to-shot time usually doesn't exceed the 2 seconds mark - a single picture took less then half a second, while five took about 8 seconds. Flash does somewhat slows the camera down, but not as much as it does with other Canon digital cameras.
More impressive than the IXUS 870 IS's speed would probably be, Canon's new DIGIC 4 (Digital Imaging Core), which can also be found in the G10 and EOS 50D among others.
Technically, a DIGIC unit is a proprietary application-specific integrated circuit designed to perform high speed signal processing as well as the control operations incorporated in the respective product.
In DIGIC 4, Canon claims improvements such as faster image processing when compared to previous processors, better focusing of moving subjects (Servo AF), improved noise reduction in high-ISO images, improved performance while handling larger 14-bit RAW images, Live Face Detection AF during Live View, and H.264 1080p encoding.
The improved Motion Detection technology delivers pretty sweet results - I was able to take a couple, fairly sharp photos, of a street act while walking down Orchard Road. How it works is that it registers movement, then automatically adjusts ISO to prevent image blur - similar to logic of using the flash (not referring to lighting reasons here of course).
Now, combined with the new Servo AF - which continuously adjusts focus on subjects moving towards or away from the camera - blur is pretty much lowered to the minimum, but of course it does still exist.
To explain the improved Face Detection technology briefly - it detects faces positioned at an angle as well as side profiles. This works pretty well, especially when taking photos of ladies in make-up - their face features are enhanced, which makes it easier to detect.
The new FaceSelf-Timer function definitely “makes group shots and self-portraits easy”. How it works is that it first detects the faces of your group, waits until it detects a new face, wait another 2 seconds, and then takes three shots in a row. Sounds complicated but once you get the hang of it, you no longer have to run to take a group shot.
Another interesting feature is i-Contrast - Canon's new Intelligent Contrast setting. It brings out great, natural-looking detail in dark areas of pictures - without blowing out lighter areas.
Theoretically this feature opens up shadow areas. It can be applied either automatically when you're shooting or after during playback. In playback you can apply the effect in gradual levels as well and create a copy, whereas when shooting the camera decides on the level.
Image noise handling is supposedly one of Canon's strong points - I pretty much have to agree. Shots with IXUS 870 IS at 80-200 ISO are more or less noise-free. But of course, as the ISO increases the effect that resembles film grains starts showing up - still good at 400 ISO.
We've pretty much covered its performance as a still camera, but in case you didn't already know, it does allow you to capture videos as well.
The resolution on movie mode can be set to either VGA or QVGA (no HD mode) in the function menu, but the frame rate is fixed at 30fps. Apparently with “its superior compression technology” it allows you to store up to 40% more footage than its predecessor, with no reduction in video quality - the maximum clip length is limited to about an hour or 4GB, whichever hits first.
The camera uses the H.264 codec to compress video. As stated in the user guide, files may or may not play back smoothly when viewed on a computer, depending on the computer's capabilities. Sound is monaural and is stored in the same MOV file as the video data.
Focus lock, auto-exposure lock and exposure compensation, AF lock and AE lock are all available for movie mode. AF lock works the same way as with stills. As for AE lock, you simply need to push the up button (there isn't other function anyway).
Honestly, the video capability is kinda secondary to me. As far as I'm concerned (tested of course), the image quality in video mode is pretty decent and the sound recording isn't too bad. In conclusion – it works for me! After all, if I do buy it, it wouldn't be for its video capabilities, would it?
The Canon Digital IXUS 870 IS is probably the best-designed IXUS to date, in the functional sense. The lens of the IXUS 870 IS goes wider, has a better macro mode and produces better off-centre sharpness at most zoom settings.
That said, I would still pick the Canon PowerShot E1 over the IXUS 870 IS any day, anytime.
In terms of design the PowerShot E1 clearly beats the IXUS 870 IS hands down with the PINK colour option (personal preference). And although, the image quality of the IXUS 870 IS is superior to the PowerShot E1, but on macro mode (which I use the most) the fine details are kinda insignificant for one like myself that takes photos mainly for the web - to reduce file size image, quality is kinda compromised.
Ultimately, the fact that the IXUS 870 IS (priced at SGD549) carries a 40-50% price premium over the PowerShot E1 concluded my decision - my budget at SGD300 only.
Nonetheless, if you don't have a colour preference, don't have a budget, and have a need for superior image quality - the IXUS 870 IS is definitely a better digital compact camera choice for you.
PS: More images to be updated soon...
I go by the name Princessa (pronounced as Prin-ces-sa) online, you can also call me Sabrina or Princess Sabrina for that matter.
SauceINK Magazine
February 2010, 2nd issue
SauceINK Magazine
January 2010, 1st issue (trial run)
December 20, 2008 - 4:03pm
I also just bought the IXUS 870 IS. Took some pictures at Parkway Parade today and at the East Coast big splash.
Very good camera ! I like it (although I do miss my Fuji FD31).
Nice blog !
December 23, 2008 - 4:11pm
[...] mentioned, the aesthetics of a camera should be a long way down any intending buyer’s checklist. [...]
December 29, 2008 - 1:19am
2 thumbs up, excellent review you got here. looking forward to those photos. it's a little word intensive
December 31, 2008 - 11:06am
just wondering where i can buy the camera at a cheap price because in the States, it is only 259USD ... but in SG, it's like 529SGD, equivalent to 368USD, it really has a big gap in the price. Just checking to see if that's possible. Please, e-mail me with your response.
Thanks.
January 7, 2009 - 3:05pm
To tell you honestly, i never had chance to see Canon Digital IXUS 870. Well, it's nice to know all this information.
January 22, 2009 - 9:29pm
Nice food in Singapore! Pretty! :)
February 9, 2009 - 2:50pm
Nice food, but i wonder why a cam with 10 mega pixels resolution has only 4 digital zooms. Anyway, does the food you featured has a family serving? i think it will be far more better if it can be feast by the family.
February 10, 2009 - 5:20pm
I kinda had problems answering this, so I kinda consulted my editor instead. Anyway, according to my editor (since I'm not quite sure how to answer this) the two factors are not related.
Cameras can have unlimited digital zoom no matter the megapixel. The body size of the camera will influence what kind of optics the camera can have, e.g. the sensor (determines megapixels) and lens. The size/length of the lens determines how much zoom it has. The older model DSLRs have low megapixel but because of the lens (seen the huge
asslenses before?) the zoom capabilities are not restricted - bigger the lens further you can zoom.What's more important is optical zoom and not digital. Optical zoom is the real mechanical capability while digital zoom is interpolated, which means that the CPU/brain/processor guesstimates what should be there and digitally adds it in - normally results in blurry, noisy pictures.
Anyway, when I said 4x zoom I meant 4x optical. If I've not mistaken digital is also 4x, so it's 4 x 4 which gives you 16. My editor's advise is to not bother with digital zoom and stick with optical. Should there be a need for the extra zoom, walk nearer to the subject instead.
Does this answer your question?
PS: FYI, my editor is Simon, so if anything is inaccurately put across, please blame him (but it should be correct). LoLx~
PPS: If you have any other question feel free (or rather please do) visit Gadget3.com's forums. My editor will be more then glad to answer your queries if I'm not able to. :)
As for the food, that's completely irrelevant to this review really - a model for the image quality. I am but one person, how much can I eat? As for whether they have family serving, I really have no idea. I can't even remember where I bought it or if I even bought it. ;x
February 9, 2009 - 10:47am
too wordy how about some more pictures yeah?
nice review btw
February 19, 2009 - 10:27am
Yes there will be, if I can find the time...
Thanks :)
February 15, 2009 - 5:25am
I used to have an Ixus and it was really good - seeing comments here, looks like I'm going to get myself a new one :p
Nice blog :)
February 16, 2009 - 12:51pm
Yup, if you are willing to pay the premium it's a good camera to have around.
February 16, 2009 - 12:55pm
I've been a user of Canon products, Printers way back the SP-256 era and now with its new PIX based printers, for digital camera Canon has a great lines of quality camera.
February 17, 2009 - 1:15pm
I agree that they have really good cameras and all, but they could really work on making a slim sleek one for the ladies.
My sister was asking what camera to buy the other day. I recommended Canon but she didn't really like the idea. Thing is, image quality is important and all, but the difference to some just aren't significant enough to pick picture quality over portability (let's not even talk about price).
July 24, 2009 - 1:25am
I really like the feature of Canon Digital IXUS 870 IS.Two thumbs for it. right sabrina?
July 24, 2009 - 4:55am
Absolutely!
July 29, 2009 - 3:43pm
Wow! This sounds new information. Thanks for letting me know!
August 3, 2009 - 12:06am
:)
February 1, 2010 - 3:46pm
Princess,
I think it is cool to have that camera. What do you think?
August 5, 2010 - 12:57pm
My friend have that Canon Digital IXUS 870. Love to have one but I have an Canon Rebel G need to have investment on the lens.
August 5, 2010 - 9:56pm
True. Lenses are so expensive. That said, it's always good to have a good compact camera around you to snap shots of daily events. I don't think I wanna drag my DSLR everywhere I go.
Post new comment